Comparison of various cytodiagnostic tests in the rapid diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis
Keywords:
Cutaneous leishmaniasis, smear techniques, fine needle aspiration biopsy smear, dental broach smear, dental broach saline smear, slit skin smear.Abstract
Background In poor endemic areas of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), lacking sufficient laboratory infrastructure, cheap and rapid diagnostic methods are critical in management. Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of newer smear techniques with slit skin smear technique in the rapid diagnosis of CL. Patients and methods: This interventional and comparative study was carried out at Combined Military Hospital Muzaffarabad, Azad Kashmir, from Jan 2008 to June 2008. Patients having suspected CL lesions, fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. In every patient, dental broach smear (DBS), dental broach saline smear (DBSS), slit-skin smear (SSS) and fine needle aspiration biopsy smear (FNABS) were made from the active edge of the lesions and then stained with Leishman’s stain, except FNABS (stained with H&E stain). At least 100 fields were examined under oil immersion lens to identify Leishman-Donovan (LD) bodies based on their morphology before declaring the specimen as negative. Newer techniques i.e. DBS, DBSS, and FNABS were compared with SSS. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and likelihood ratio were calculated using statistical program SPSS version 12.0. Results Sixty patients were enrolled which included 31 (51.7%) males and 29 (48.3%) females, ranging in age from 3 to 68 years (mean 25.4+21.9 years). FNABS showed highest positive rate (55%) followed by DBS (46.6%), SSS (36.6%) and DBSS (25%). DBS showed highest sensitivity and specificity, followed by FNABS. Conclusion DBS and FNABS showed a better yield than the traditional SSS method of direct microscopy in CL.ÂReferences
Bari AU. Epidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Pak Assoc Dermatol 2006; 16: 156-62.
Grevelink SA, Lerner EA. Leishmaniasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 34: 257-72.
Bari AU. Chronology of cutaneous leishmaniasis: An overview of the history of the disease. J Pak Assoc Dermatol 2006; 16: 24-7.
Markle WH, Makhoul K. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: recognition and treatment. Am Fam Physician 2004; 69: 455-6082-84.*
Berman JD: Human leishmaniasis: clinical, diagnostic, and chemotherapeutic developments in the last 10 years. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24: 684-703
Bari AU, Rahman SB. Diagnostic modalities in cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Pak Assoc Dermatol 2004; 14: 81-6.
Gupta LK, Singhi MK. Tzanck smear: A useful diagnostic tool. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2005; 71: 295-9.
Sharquie KE, Hassen AS, Hassan SA, Al-Hamami IA. Evaluation of diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis by direct smear, culture and histopathology. Saudi Med J 2002; 23: 925-8.
Tzanck A. Le cytodiagnostic immediate en dermatologie. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syph 1947; 7: 68. Quoted from: Barr RJ, Irvine CA. Cutaneous cytology. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984; 10: 163-80).
Mashhood AA, Khan IM, Nasir S et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology versus histopathology in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Pakistan. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005; 15: 71-3.
Khan I, Yasmin R. Comparison of fine needle aspiration with biopsy in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis J Pak Assoc Dermatol 2007; 17: 154-8.
Kassi M, Tareen I, Qazi A, Kasi PM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Ann Saudi Med 2004; 24: 93-7.
Al-Jitawi SA, Farraj SE, Ramahi SA. Conventional scraping versus fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Acta Cytol 1995; 39: 82-4.
Ridley DS. The laboratory diagnosis of tropical diseases: review. J Clin Pathol 1974; 27: 435-44.
Mallik MK, Das DK, Haji BE. Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in a 6-month-old child: a case report. Acta Cytol 2001; 45: 1005-7.
Dar NR, Khurshid T. Comparison of skin smears and biopsy specimens for demonstration of Leishmania tropica bodies in cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005; 15: 765-7.
Sharquie KE, Hassen AS, Hassan SA, Al-Hamami IA. Evaluation of diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis by direct smear, culture and histopathology. Saudi Med J 2002; 23: 925-8.
Magill AJ. Leishmaniasis. In: Strickland GT, ed. Hunter's Tropical Medicine and Emerging and Infectious Diseases, 8th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000. P. 665-87.
Robinson RJ, Agudelo S, Muskus C et al. The method used to sample ulcers influences the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2002; 96: S169-171.
