Comparing the Efficacy of Oral 200 Milligram Voriconazole Once a Day Vs Twice a Day in the Treatment of Resistant Dermatophyte Infections (Tinea Corporis and Tinea Cruris)

Authors

  • Muhammad Khurram Shahzad Department of Dermatology, Sheikh Zayed Hospital Rahim Yar Khan
  • Tahir Hassan Department of Dermatology, Sheikh Zayed Hospital Rahim Yar Khan
  • Raheel Tahir Department of Dermatology, Nishtar Medical University Multan

Keywords:

Tinea, Voriconazole; Dermatomycoses; Drug Resistance; Fungal; Antifungal Agents

Abstract

Background:  Treatment of dermatophyte infection in our country is becoming difficult due to the developing resistance to traditional antifungal agents. Assessing the effectiveness and feasibility of a newer antifungal drug like voriconazole is the need of the hour in resistant cases. Objective:  To compare the efficacy of oral 200 milligram voriconazole once a day vs twice a day in the treatment of resistant dermatophyte infections (tinea corporis and cruris). Methods:  This Randomized Controlled Trial (registration number NCT06680544.) was carried out in Outpatient Dermatology Department, Sheikh Zayed Hospital Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. Total 106 patients were divided into two groups, Group A and Group B, each consisting of 53 patients. Group A was given oral voriconazole 200mg once a day and Group B was given twice a day for a maximum of 28 days. Efficacy was assessed at day 14 and day 28, and relapse was noted at the 2-month follow-up visit. Data was recorded on a preformed Proforma for each patient and analyzed using SPSS 24. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:  In Group A, complete clinical cure/efficacy was noted in 28.3% and 94.7% patients at day 14 and 28, respectively. In Group B, complete clinical cure/efficacy was noted in 34.0% and 94.4% patients at day 14 p= 0.338) and 28 (p=0.817), respectively. Over all 22 patients (20.7%) showed relapse. Visual disturbance in the form of altered perception of light after first dose was the most common side effect noted. Conclusion:  Oral voriconazole at a dosage of 200 mg once daily is comparable in efficacy and safety to 200 mg twice daily regimen but is more cost effective in treatment of resistant tinea corporis and tinea cruris.

References

Gnat S, Łagowski D, Nowakiewicz A, Dyląg M. A global view on fungal infections in humans and animals: opportunistic infections and microsporid-ioses. J Appl Microbiol. 2021 1;131(5):2095-113. Doi: 10.1111/jam.15032.

Upadhyay V, Kumar A, Singh AK, Pandey J. Epi-demiological characterization of dermatophytes at a tertiary care hospital in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Curr Med Mycol. 2019;5(1):1-6. Doi: 10.18502/cmm.5.1.530.

Kalita JM, Sharma A, Bhardwaj A, Nag VL. Derma-tophytoses and spectrum of dermatophytes in pat-ients attending a teaching hospital in Western Ra-jasthan, India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 ;8(4):1418-21. Doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_159_19.

Singh BS, Tripathy T, Kar BR, Ray A. Clinicomyco-logical study of dermatophytosis in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India: A cross-sectional study. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2020 ;11(1):46-50.

Hoq AJ, Sultana F, MJ A, GM MR. Efficacy of vori-conazole among 500 dermatophytes patients: A study in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Cumilla, Bangla-desh. Am J Dermatol Venereol. 2020;9:17-20.

Leung AK, Barankin B. An itchy, round rash on the back of an adolescent’s neck. Consult Pediatr. 2014; 13:466-9.

Velasquez-Agudelo V, Cardona-Arias JA. Meta-analysis of the utility of culture, biopsy, and direct KOH examination for the diagnosis of onychomy-cosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2017; 17(1):166.

Doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2258-3.

Sajid M, Asim SA, Iqbal T, Shaikh SS. Isolation and identification of fungal species in patients of recal-citrant tinea corporis and/or tinea cruris attending tertiary care hospital in Karachi. J Pak Assoc Der-matol. 2023;33(3):929-34.

Shahzad MK, Hassan T, Tahir R, Jawaid K, Khan MF, Naveed MA. Efficacy of oral voriconazole in the treatment of dermatophyte infections (Tinea Corporis and Cruris). Pak. J. Med. Health Sci. 2022;16(02):330-2.

Gupta AK, Venkataraman M. Antifungal resistance in superficial mycoses. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(4):1888-95. Doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.194 2421

Suleri ZS. Recurrent tinea corporis and cruris: Anti-fungal resistance or poor compliance? J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2020;30(1):1-2.

Zeeshan F, Sabir M, Uddin F. The rising menace of antifungal resistance in dermatophytes among the patients of tinea capitis. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023 Jan 1;73(1):43-8. Doi: 10.47391/JPMA.5307.

Farooqi J, Bongomin F, Hasan R, Nasir N, Irfan M, Mahmood SF, Zafar A, Mir F, Nizamuddin S, Jabeen K. The Second International Collaborative Mycology Conference: evidence-informed fight against fungal diseases in Pakistan. Ther Adv In-fect Dis. 2024;11:20499361241272510.

Clary RT, Deja E, Rittmann B, Bearman G. Impact of Voriconazole Therapeutic Drug Monitoring on Adverse Effects and Clinical Outcomes: A Litera-ture Review. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2025;27(1):6.

Kashif S, Uddin F, Nasir F, Zafar S, Jabeen S, Kumar S. Prevalence of dermatophytes in superficial skin infections in a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2021;31(3):484-8.

McCormick TS, Ghannoum M. Time to Think Anti-fungal Resistance Increased Antifungal Resistance Exacerbates the Burden of Fungal Infections Inclu-ding Resistant Dermatomycoses. Pathog Immun. 2023;8(2):158-76. Doi: 10.20411/pai.v8i2.656

Gnat S, Łagowski D, Nowakiewicz A. Major chal-lenges and perspectives in the diagnostics and treatment of dermatophyte infections. J Appl Micr-obiol. 2020;129(2):212-32. Doi: 10.1111/jam.14611.

Sacheli R, Hayette MP. Antifungal resistance in dermatophytes: genetic considerations, clinical pre-sentations and alternative therapies. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(11):983. Doi: 10.3390/jof7110983.

Kafi MA, Akter M, Khan R, Ahmed SS, Hassan MJ, Hassan MS. Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment of resistant cases of dermatophytosis. J ZHSWMC. 2020;2(1):3-6.

Mangal N, Hamadeh IS, Arwood MJ, Cavallari LH, Samant TS, Klinker KP, Bulitta J, Schmidt S. Opti-mization of voriconazole therapy for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in adults. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;104(5):957-65.

Allegra S, Fatiguso G, De Francia S, Favata F, Pirro E, Carcieri C, De Nicolò A, Cusato J, Di Perri G, D'Avolio A. Therapeutic drug monitoring of vori-conazole for treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(1):197-203. Doi: 10.1111/bcp.13401

Miyakis S, Van Hal SJ, Ray J, Marriott D. Voricona-zole concentrations and outcome of invasive fungal infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(7): 927-33. Doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02990.x.

Noor T, Asma A, Jamil A, Kamran DS, Parveen S, Ali A. Frequency, sociodemographic features and variations in clinical presentation of steroid indu-ced dermatophytosis from a tertiary care hospital of Karachi. Professional Med J. 2023; 30(06):803-8.

Preethi P, Narasimhan M, Datchanamoorthy M, Bharathi M, Vajravelu LK. Clinico Mycological Pro-file of Dermatophyte Infectior at A Tertiary Care Hospital from South India. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2023;17(4):2591-8.

BS C, Poojitha DS. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of oral voriconazole in the management of recalci-trant and recurrent dermatophytosis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47(1):30-6. doi: 10.1111/ced.14799.

Ahmed SS, Ahmed SS, Haque MM, Tabassum F. Efficacy and Safety of Oral Voriconazole in Refrac-tory and Recurrent Cases of Dermatophytosis: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh. Saudi J Med. 2022;7(11):591.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Muhammad Khurram Shahzad, Tahir Hassan, Raheel Tahir. Comparing the Efficacy of Oral 200 Milligram Voriconazole Once a Day Vs Twice a Day in the Treatment of Resistant Dermatophyte Infections (Tinea Corporis and Tinea Cruris). J Pak Assoc Dermatol [Internet]. 2025Sep.30 [cited 2025Nov.25];35(3):242-9. Available from: https://jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/3154

Issue

Section

Original Articles